Chapter 1: The Unlikely Favorite

If I were to share that a particular television program is my favorite, what assumptions might you make? Would you think I believe it to be a top-notch production? You would be mistaken. Would you assume that it offers valuable insights? Again, you would be wrong. Would you imagine that I would endorse this show to others? Not at all.

The program I’m referring to is quite poor and serves as a glaring illustration of many failings in our educational framework, particularly its promotion of skepticism. It often resembles propaganda. Is it possible that this is a deliberate strategy to prime audiences for accepting dubious claims? That’s my suspicion. It appears that someone is utilizing this and similar programs to sway viewers, with motives that extend beyond just garnering high ratings.

The show in question is Expedition Bigfoot, which airs on the Travel Channel. If this channel’s current focus seems out of place, remember that it has strayed from its travel roots for quite some time, evolving into what could be termed a “paranormal channel.” Nowadays, viewers are treated to an array of content featuring Bigfoot, extraterrestrial beings, and spectral phenomena.

Why Am I Drawn to It?

But if the show is so lackluster, why do I tune in? How can I label it as my favorite viewing experience? The answer lies in the sheer hilarity it brings me, laughing out loud at its absurdity in ways that no other program does. It stands as a prime example of the “unintentionally funny” genre that I find utterly enjoyable. However, this enjoyment is often overshadowed by the realization that many viewers fail to recognize its true nature.

My amusement stems from the earnestness of the Bigfoot enthusiasts featured in the show. They speak of “evidence” and even “proof” they claim to have gathered. However, what they present often amounts to trivial findings that lack explanation. They concoct intricate “experiments” aimed at validating preconceived beliefs, which bear little resemblance to genuine scientific inquiry (i.e., not at all).

The Dangers of Pseudoscience

This predicament also underscores the harmful aspects of this and similar programs. Labeling something as “evidence” and packaging it as scientific does not transform it into actual science. Employing scientific tools without adhering to the scientific method is not legitimate science. Prematurely concluding that Bigfoot exists without thorough investigation is pseudoscience, which can mislead viewers.

Do such programs mirror our current era, characterized by a lack of consensus on fundamental realities? Or do they contribute to this divide? I’m uncertain, but I worry that they indeed play a role in perpetuating confusion. I suspect that these shows are not mere accidents; there seems to be a deliberate agenda at work, benefiting those who thrive on division and ignorance.

If not for copyright issues, I would love to use shows like this as tools for teaching critical thinking. Imagine a classroom where students could watch excerpts and pinpoint the myriad flaws in reasoning. It would provide an excellent opportunity to contrast what they witness with established scientific principles. Such an exercise would not only hone critical thinking skills but also better equip students to navigate the misinformation they encounter.

Television programs of this nature present a conundrum. I genuinely believe they can be detrimental. Thus, there’s a compelling argument against viewing them. Yet, they are undeniably entertaining. They also offer insight into societal beliefs. Without engaging with these shows, I might remain perplexed about why some individuals are so willing to accept implausible ideas.

But, What About Bigfoot?

As I conclude, I would like to address Bigfoot enthusiasts. I make no assertions regarding the existence of such a creature. I remain uncertain about whether beings like Bigfoot actually exist. The evidence presented is insufficient for me to draw any conclusions. The idea of such a creature intrigues me, and I would be thrilled if they were found to be real. However, I refuse to accept them as fact without compelling evidence. Until then, I will remain a curious yet skeptical admirer of Bigfoot.

You can find my writing through my links on Twitter. If you want easy access to excellent writing, consider joining Medium for $5/month or $50/year. If you sign up through my link, I will receive a small referral fee at no extra cost to you. To receive email notifications whenever I publish, subscribe here.

Chapter 2: Engaging with Media

The first video titled "What Is Your Favorite TV Show and Why?" explores the motivations behind our viewing choices and invites viewers to reflect on their preferences.

The second video, "My Top 10 Favorite TV Shows," highlights various beloved programs, providing a personal touch to the discussion of television favorites.