Section 1.1: What is Synthetic Data?

Synthetic data refers to information generated using computer algorithms rather than being gathered from real-world events. It does not exist in reality but is created to reflect various scenarios. Although the concept of synthetic data is not new, advancements in technology have significantly increased its relevance across multiple sectors. Here are several applications of synthetic data in data science:

• Generation of large datasets without the need for collection
• Creation of datasets that mirror real-world situations
• Addressing privacy concerns related to data usage
• Simulation of hypothetical conditions
• Balancing data distributions

The ongoing research in synthetic data continues to unveil new applications, showcasing its vital role in the data science arena.

Additionally, synthetic data can be generated through several methods, including:

• Multiple Imputation: A traditional method treating data as missing, estimating predictive models based on observed values. This technique generates synthetic datasets through assumed imputation methods.
• Generative Models: Employing unsupervised machine learning models like GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks) and VAEs (Variational Autoencoders) to create synthetic data by identifying and learning patterns in the input data.
• Agent-Based Modeling (ABM): A system where autonomous agents make decisions based on certain rules, which can lead to the generation of synthetic data.

Having established the significance of synthetic data, we now need to examine how it can aid in developing fraud detection models.

Section 1.2: The Impact of Fraud and Data Imbalance

Fraud is fundamentally an act of deception aimed at securing profit through unlawful means. Every business faces this risk, and the frequency of fraudulent cases is typically much lower than legitimate transactions. This disparity arises because the majority of people act honestly; reversing this scenario would lead to the collapse of businesses.

The effectiveness of a fraud detection project hinges on two primary factors: the overarching business strategy and the design of the fraud model itself. As data scientists, our focus should be on refining the fraud model, but this task is challenging due to the inherent imbalance in the data.

Most occurrences of fraud are rare, leading to a situation where prediction models often misclassify the majority of cases. This imbalance skews accuracy metrics while undermining precision and recall.

How does synthetic data relate to this imbalance? Research indicates that synthetic data can help alleviate the data imbalance by oversampling minority cases, thus creating a balanced dataset. For instance, models trained on balanced datasets using synthetic data often outperform those trained on imbalanced datasets.

A well-known technique for achieving this balance is the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), although it has limitations with complex datasets. Therefore, we will explore another approach involving GANs, which have shown promise in enhancing machine learning performance.

Section 2.1: Developing a Fraud Detection Model

For our demonstration, we will utilize the Health Care Provider Fraud Detection dataset from Kaggle, which focuses on identifying customers likely to commit fraud on claims.

To simplify the analysis, we will employ Pandas Profiling for exploratory data analysis (EDA). The dataset consists of approximately 32 variables and 517,737 observations, predominantly numerical, with no missing values.

import pandas as pd

from pandas_profiling import ProfileReport

profile = ProfileReport(df, minimal=True)

As we explore the dataset, we observe that the target variable 'PotentialFraud' is imbalanced, with only 36.6% of cases labeled as fraud.

Next, we will create a classifier to predict fraud among healthcare providers while managing the categorical data for training purposes.

df = df.drop(['Unnamed: 0', 'BeneID', 'ClaimID', 'ClaimStartDt', 'ClaimEndDt', 'Provider', 'DOB', 'Race', 'State', 'County', 'Gender'], axis=1)

df['PotentialFraud'] = df['PotentialFraud'].apply(lambda x: 1 if x == 'Yes' else 0)

df = df.sample(100000)

After cleaning the data, we will prepare the training set for our model.

from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

from sklearn.metrics import classification_report

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(df.drop('PotentialFraud', axis=1), df['PotentialFraud'], train_size=0.7, stratify=df['PotentialFraud'], random_state=100)

model = RandomForestClassifier()

model.fit(X_train, y_train)

Using the Random Forest model, we evaluate its initial performance.

y_pred = model.predict(X_test)

print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

Initial results show a tendency to predict non-fraud cases predominantly. To enhance model performance, we will incorporate synthetic data.

First, we will install the necessary package and utilize the Conditional Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (CWGAN-GP) model to generate synthetic data.

pip install ydata-synthetic

We will then configure the dataset for the CWGAN-GP model.

X_train_synth = X_train.copy()

X_train_synth['PotentialFraud'] = y_train

X_train_synth_min = X_train_synth[X_train_synth['PotentialFraud'] == 1].copy()

Next, we set up and train the CWGAN-GP model.

from ydata_synthetic.synthesizers import ModelParameters, TrainParameters

from ydata_synthetic.synthesizers.regular import CWGANGP

synth_model = CWGANGP

noise_dim = 61

dim = 128

batch_size = 128

log_step = 100

epochs = 200

learning_rate = 5e-4

beta_1 = 0.5

beta_2 = 0.8

models_dir = './cache'

gan_args = ModelParameters(batch_size=batch_size, lr=learning_rate, betas=(beta_1, beta_2), noise_dim=noise_dim, layers_dim=dim)

train_args = TrainParameters(epochs=epochs, sample_interval=log_step)

synthesizer = synth_model(gan_args, n_critic=10, num_classes=10)

Once the training is complete, we generate synthetic samples.

synth_data = synthesizer.sample(condition=np.array([1]), n_samples=100000)

We will integrate this synthesized data into our training set to achieve balance.

minority_synth_data = synth_data[synth_data['PotentialFraud'] == 1].sample(26758)

X_train_synth_true = pd.concat([X_train_synth, minority_synth_data]).reset_index(drop=True).copy()

Finally, we will retrain the model with the balanced dataset.

model.fit(X_train_synth_true.drop('PotentialFraud', axis=1), X_train_synth_true['PotentialFraud'])

y_pred = model.predict(X_test)

print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

This adjustment demonstrates a modest improvement in model performance due to the balanced dataset, suggesting that synthetic data can indeed enhance fraud detection capabilities.

Section 2.2: Conclusion

Fraud remains a significant challenge for businesses, necessitating effective mitigation strategies. One effective approach involves utilizing synthetic data to improve fraud detection models. Our exploration highlights how synthetic data can address data imbalance issues, leading to better model performance.

In our practical experiment, the model trained on a balanced dataset containing synthetic data yielded improved results compared to the original dataset, underscoring the potential of synthetic data in fraud modeling.

For further insights, check out the video "Using AI in Fraud Detection | Beginner Data Science Project."

Stay informed on the latest developments in data-driven insights.